Key result
Epi-aortic ultrasound successfully diagnosed an intraoperative iatrogenic type-A aortic dissection at the antegrade cardioplegia cannulation site that was initially undetectable by transesophageal echocardiography.
Why the study?
Iatrogenic aortic dissection at the antegrade cardioplegia cannulation site is very rare, presenting challenges with early diagnosis and detection via TEE.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Epi-aortic ultrasound is a valuable alternative for detecting intraoperative iatrogenic aortic dissection when TEE visualization is inadequate.
May detect TEE-missed aortic dissections intraoperatively; leaves open need for prospective validation before routine adoption.
Iatrogenic aortic dissection is a rare and serious complication of cardiac surgery with an incidence between 0.12' and 0.16'. Dissections involving an intimal flap can be detected using trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) with a sensitivity of 94'-100' and specificity of 77'-100'. Rarely, dissections can occur that are not detectable by TEE. There have been reports of iatrogenic dissection in the ascending aortic cannulation site; however, a dissection at the antegrade cardioplegia cannulation site is very rare. It also presents challenges associated with early diagnosis and appropriate intervention. We are describing a rare case of aortic dissection at the antegrade cardioplegia cannulation site in the proximal ascending aorta. The dissection was unable to be visualized with TEE initially, and required epi-aortic ultrasound to diagnose dissection in timely manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhoades et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Intraoperative iatrogenic aortic dissection (n=1). Epi-aortic ultrasound vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Detection of aortic dissection. Epi-aortic ultrasound successfully diagnosed an intraoperative iatrogenic type-A aortic dissection at the antegrade cardioplegia cannulation site that was initially undetectable by transesophageal echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: