Key result
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had slightly higher compliance with diabetes screening guidelines compared to the general population (72.3% vs 70.4%; OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09; p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Is compliance with diabetes screening guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to the general population?
Cohort (n=45,203)
Is compliance with diabetes screening guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to the general population?
Compliance with diabetes screening guidelines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is suboptimal and only marginally better than the general population, despite their higher risk for cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suboptimal diabetes screening persists in rheumatoid arthritis despite elevated cardiovascular risk; this cohort study leaves open whether targeted interventions improve adherence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance with diabetes screening guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to the general population. METHODS: We conducted the first longitudinal study of a population-based RA cohort including all prevalent RA cases in British Columbia between 1996 and 2006 and followed until 2010, with matched general population comparators. Using administrative data, we measured compliance with general population guidelines [i.e., testing plasma glucose (PG) at least once every 3 years after age 45] after excluding individuals with previous diabetes. Followup was divided into 3-year eligibility periods. Compliance was measured as the proportion of periods with ≥ 1 PG test performed. OR (95% CI) of compliance in RA (vs general population) was calculated using generalized estimating equation models, adjusting for age and sex. Mean compliance rate per patient was also calculated and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Analysis included 22,624 individuals with RA, contributing 48,724 three-year eligibility periods; and 22,579 people in a general population group, contributing 51,081 three-year eligibility periods. PG was measured in 72.3% (SD 37%) of the eligible time periods in the RA sample and in 70.4% (SD 38%) for the general population (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p < 0.0001). RA individuals met recommended screening guidelines in 71.4% of their eligible periods, compared to 70.6% (p < 0.001). Screening improved over time in RA relative to the general population. Family physicians ordered nearly all the PG tests. CONCLUSION: Compliance with general population guidelines for diabetes screening in RA was suboptimal, with little difference relative to the general population, despite a higher risk of CVD and diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Rheumatoid arthritis (n=45,203). Rheumatoid arthritis vs. General population was evaluated on Compliance with diabetes screening guidelines (proportion of 3-year periods with ≥1 plasma glucose test) (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p=< 0.0001). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had slightly higher compliance with diabetes screening guidelines compared to the general population (72.3% vs 70.4%; OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: