Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
10 adolescent baseball players and 10 nonplayers made estimates of baseballs' arrival at the front edge of a home plate. Balls were projected 45 ft. by a pitching machine at speeds of 35, 40, 45, and 50 mph. Subjects made estimates with the dominant and nondominant eye closest to the oncoming ball. Analysis indicated that players were no more accurate than nonplayers but did respond significantly earlier and with consistency. Eye dominance had no effect on performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Dunham (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: