Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ethylene trimerization SNS ligand has been modified by replacing the methylene carbons flanking the nitrogen atom with dimethyl silyl groups. Three ligands, CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy ( a ), ( t -Bu)SCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 S( t -Bu) ( b ), and PhSCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SPh ( c ), have been prepared. Ligand a in either protonated or deprotonated forms was reacted with CrCl 3 (THF) 3 to afford the corresponding monomeric [CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]CrCl 3 ( 1a ) or dimeric {[CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 NSi(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]CrCl(μ-Cl)} 2 ( 2a ). One-pot reaction of a in the presence of Et 2 AlCl with either Cr(III) or Cr(II) chlorides afforded in either case the divalent {[CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]Cr{(μ-Cl)Al(CH 2 CH 3 ) 2 Cl} 2 ( 3a ). To deprotonate the N–H function of the Si-SNS ligand, n -BuLi was used for the purpose of preparing the divalent chromium analogue. The reaction afforded in the case of both a and b the two nearly isostructural divalent complexes {[CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 NSi(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]Cr(μ-Cl)} 2 ( 4a ) and {[( t -Bu)SCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 NSi(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 S( t -Bu)]Cr(μ-Cl)} 2 ( 4b ) in crystalline form. To further clarify the interaction of 4 with aluminate species, we have carried out in situ complexation in the presence of either AlCl 3 or AlMe 3 and using divalent instead of trivalent chromium salts. In the cases of ligands a and c and AlCl 3, two isostructural complexes, {[CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]Cr{(μ-Cl)AlCl 3 } 2 ( 5a ) and {[PhSCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(H)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SPh]C{(μ-Cl)AlCl 3 } 2 ( 5c ), have been obtained. The reaction with AlMe 3 afforded {[CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(Al(CH 3 ) 2 -μ-Cl)Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]Cr{(μ-Cl)Al(CH 3 ) 3 } ( 6a ). Its structure was informative, showing a possible catalyst deactivation pathway. To better evaluate the role of the N–H function, we have also methylated ligand a at the N atom. The complexation to chromium was successful only in the presence of Me 2 AlCl and if a divalent chromium precursor was used. The reaction afforded the catalytically inactive divalent {[CySCH 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 N(CH 3 )Si(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 SCy]Cr(μ-Cl)} 2 {(Al(CH 3 ) 2 Cl) 2 )(μ-Cl)} 2 ( 7d ). Most of these species showed good catalytic activity upon activation but produced only statistical distributions of oligomers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albahily et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: