Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of [PtL][PF6]2(L =[12]aneS4= 1,4,7,10-tetrathiacyclododecane, [14]aneS4= 1,4,8,11-tetrathiacyclotetradecane or [16]aneS4= 1,5,9,13-tetrathiacyclohexadecane) with Cl2–CCl4 or Br2–CCl4 in MeCN solution afforded the corresponding platinum(IV) species [PtX2L][PF6]2 in high yield as yellow (X = Cl) or orange (X = Br) solids. These species have been characterised by IR spectroscopy, FAB mass spectrometry and microanalytical data. Platinum-195 NMR spectroscopic studies on the parent platinum(II) complexes and on the platinum(IV) oxidation products confirm S4 and S4X2 donor sets respectively. These studies also indicate that [PtX2([16]aneS4)][PF6]2 probably exist as trans-dihalides, whereas [PtX2([12]aneS4)][PF6]2 and [PtX2([14]aneS4)][PF6]2 are probably cis-dihalides. The crystal structure of [Pt([16]aneS4)][PF6]2·2MeCN shows the PtII occupying a crystallographic inversion centre, co-ordinated to a square-planar tetrathia donor set with the free S-based lone pairs adopting the up, up, down, down configuration, Pt–S 2.310(2)Å. Platinum L-III edge EXAFS (extended X-ray absorption fine structure) data have been recorded for these complexes. The Pt–S bond lengths for the platinum(II) complexes compare well with those derived from single-crystal X-ray crystallography, while the Pt–S and Pt–X distances determined from EXAFS studies for the platinum(IV) complexes show that oxidation of PtII to PtIV typically results in a slight lengthening of the Pt–S bond lengths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blake et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: