Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethylene insertion into the metal−methyl bonds of group 4 (Ti, Zr) (C 5 H 5 ) 2 MCH 3 + and H 2 Si(C 5 H 4 )( t BuN)MCH 3 + catalyst cations has been investigated at the ab initio level, employing DZV- and DZP-quality basis sets together with Moller−Plesset perturbative and coupled-cluster single-double excitation wave function expansions. All reactions are found to proceed from reactants to products via intermediate π-complexes and subsequent Cossee−Arlman four-center transition state structures. Enthalpic barriers for the insertion step strongly depend on the nature of the ancillary ligand and metal, with Δ H ⧧ increasing in the order (C 5 H 5 ) 2 TiCH 3 + < (C 5 H 5 ) 2 ZrCH 3 + ≈ H 2 Si(C 5 H 4 )( t BuN)TiCH 3 + < H 2 Si(C 5 H 4 )( t BuN)ZrCH 3 + . Furthermore, metallocene H 2 Si< bridging has the effect of increasing the electrophilicity toward ethylene. The observed ethylene activation/insertion structural and energetic trends may be rationalized using qualitative electronic structure arguments, ancillary ligand steric hindrance, and metal ionic radius. Electron correlation effects are found in all cases to play a crucial role in predicting reaction energetics. Reasonable, incremental convergence in computed energies is obtained for Zr systems and for the H 2 Si(C 5 H 4 )( t BuN)TiCH 3 + cation upon increasing the calculational level (MP2 → MP3 → MP4-SDQ → CCSD). In contrast, fluctuations in results are found for the (C 5 H 5 ) 2 TiCH 3 + cations, indicating the desirability of high-level calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanza et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: