This paper studies argumentation-based dialogues between agents. It defines a set of locutions by which agents can trade arguments, a set of agent attitudes which relate what arguments an agent can build and what locutions it can make, and a set of protocols by which dialogues can be carried out. The paper then considers some properties of dialogues under the protocols, in particular termination, dialogue outcomes, and complexity, and shows how these relate to the agent attitudes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2003 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: