Key result
The Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer was inadequate for screening samples containing platelet clumping and did not provide sufficiently accurate platelet counts in the presence of clumping.
Why the study?
Pseudothrombocytopenia caused by platelet clumping can lead to unnecessary platelet transfusions or underdiagnosis of hematologic neoplasms, prompting evaluation of the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer for detecting platelet clumping and obtaining accurate platelet counts.
Does the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer accurately detect platelet clumping and determine platelet counts compared to standard methods?
Cross-Sectional (n=135)
Does the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer accurately detect platelet clumping and determine platelet counts compared to standard methods?
The DI-60 digital image analyzer is unreliable for determining accurate platelet counts in samples with platelet clumping.
DI-60 platelet counts with clumping require manual confirmation; leaves open validation of digital morphology analyzers.
Pseudothrombocytopenia caused by platelet clumping (PC) can lead to unnecessary platelet transfusions or underdiagnosis of hematologic neoplasms. To overcome these limitations, we assessed the capacity of the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) for detecting PC and determining an accurate platelet count in the presence of PC. For this purpose, 135 samples with or without PC (groups Y and N, respectively) were processed by an examiner (a hematologic specialist) using both the Sysmex XN-9000 and DI-60 analyzers. Although the platelet aggregate (PA) and giant platelet (GP) counts reported by the DI-60 and the examiner exhibited strong correlations, they proved inadequate as effective indicators for screening samples containing PC. Between the PA and GP counts and four platelet indices (the platelet distribution width [PDW], mean platelet volume [MPV], platelet large cell ratio [P_LCR], and plateletcrit [PCT]) reported by the XN-9000, we observed statistically significant correlations (both overall and with group Y), but they were relatively weak. The platelet counts determined using the DI-60 and light microscopy in group Y showed substantial variations. Although the performance of the DI-60 was reliable for detecting PA and GP in smear images, such fixed areas are not representative of whole samples. Further, in the presence of PC, the resulting platelet counts determined using the DI-60 were not sufficiently accurate to be accepted as the final count.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woo et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Pseudothrombocytopenia caused by platelet clumping (n=135). Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer vs. Sysmex XN-9000 and light microscopy was evaluated on Detection of platelet clumping and accurate platelet count determination. The Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer was inadequate for screening samples containing platelet clumping and did not provide sufficiently accurate platelet counts in the presence of clumping.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: