Key result
The FMD volume ratio was significantly higher in the luteal phase (137.5%) compared to the menstrual phase (101.9%, p=0.0032), indicating improved endothelial function during the luteal phase.
Why the study?
Does a novel sphygmomanometer cuff-based method detect differences in flow-mediated vasodilation between the menstrual and luteal phases in healthy women?
Observational (n=26)
No
Does a novel sphygmomanometer cuff-based method detect differences in flow-mediated vasodilation between the menstrual and luteal phases in healthy women?
A novel sphygmomanometer cuff-based method successfully detected significant increases in flow-mediated vasodilation during the luteal phase compared to the menstrual phase, offering a potential home-based tool for assessing endothelial function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports cycle-phase endothelial variation via cuff-based FMD; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The endothelial function has been proven to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, hypertension and heart failure. The flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the peripheral artery is an endothelium-dependent function. Brachial-artery ultrasound scanning is the popular method for evaluating FMD. However, good technical training on ultrasonography is required for the user to obtain high-quality data. Therefore, the goal of this study was to propose a new method which only used a sphygmomanometer cuff to occlude the blood flow and record the vascular volume waveform (Vwave). RESULTS: We used this method to assess the FMD in the menstrual cycle for 26 volunteer females. All female subjects were evaluated two times (M: menstrual phase; F: luteal phase) in one menstrual cycle and for two cycles. In the first cycle, the FMD volume ratio in M was 101.9 ± 45.5 % and was higher in L, at 137.5 ± 62.1 % (p = 0.0032 versus M). In the second cycle, the FMD volume ratios in M and L were 91.4 ± 37.0 % and 124.0 ± 56.4 %, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. M). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have confirmed those results in the study of Hametner et al. Blood pressure measurement and FMD assessment all used the same mechanic of digital blood pressure monitor, which makes our method suitable using at home.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=26). Luteal phase vs. Menstrual phase was evaluated on Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) volume ratio (first cycle) (p=0.0032). The FMD volume ratio was significantly higher in the luteal phase (137.5%) compared to the menstrual phase (101.9%, p=0.0032), indicating improved endothelial function during the luteal phase.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: