Key result
Higher Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score significantly correlated with performance on 4 of 8 cognitive measures in Mexican American elders, with a stronger association in females.
Why the study?
Mexican-Americans have a higher prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors than Non-Hispanic whites, but the utility of FCVDRS as a predictor of cognitive performance in Mexican American elders is unclear.
Does the Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score predict cognitive performance in Mexican American elders?
Cohort (n=429)
No
Does the Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score predict cognitive performance in Mexican American elders?
The Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score demonstrates predictive utility for cognitive function in Mexican American elders, with a particularly strong association in females.
FCVDRS may flag cognitive vulnerability in Mexican American elders, especially females; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Mexican-Americans have a higher prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors as compared to Non-Hispanic whites. This study aims to elucidate the utility of the Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score (FCVDRS) as a predictor of cognitive performance on a cohort of Mexican Americans elders. 429 Mexican-Americans (338 female and 91 male) from a longitudinal study conducted at The University of North Texas Health Science Center were studied. Demographic and clinical data relevant to Framingham Cardiovascular Disease 10-year Risk Score (FCVDRS) were assessed. FCVDRS was calculated based on Body Mass Index (BMI) and categorized as Low if <10, Moderate if between 10 and 20, and High if >20. Cognitive performance on Trails B, Wechsler Logical Memory I and II, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Animal Naming (AN) tests. Demographic data was analyzed using t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. Pearson correlation tests and ANOVAs were used to compare FCVDRS, as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable, against cognitive performance. Both Pearson correlation tests and linear regression analysis, showed significant correlations between FCVDRS and performance on 4 of the 8 measures of cognitive performance. ANOVAs with Post-Hoc analysis also showed that the difference in cognitive performance was more pronounced between groups with greater differences in FCVDRS. In all analyses, the strength of the relationship was stronger in females. The results show that FCDVRS has high predictive utility in measures of cognitive function. Gender specific analysis between FCVDRS and cognitive performance indicate a stronger association in females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vintimilla et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cognitive performance and cardiovascular risk (n=429). Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score (FCVDRS) vs. Lower FCVDRS was evaluated on Cognitive performance on Trails B, Wechsler Logical Memory I and II, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Animal Naming (AN) tests. Higher Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score significantly correlated with performance on 4 of 8 cognitive measures in Mexican American elders, with a stronger association in females.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: