Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ham's F-10, a chemically defined, complex culture medium, commonly used for in vitro fertilization of human as well as animal oocytes, blocked development at the 2-cell stage of greater than 92% of embryos from random-bred Swiss mice (CD-1), but did not block development of embryos from hybrid-inbred mice (BDF1). In contrast, BWW, a simple, modified Kreb's-Ringer bicarbonate medium, supported development to blastocysts of 85% and 100% of 2-cell embryos from CD1 and BDF1 females, respectively. As little as 15% (v/v) Ham's F-10 added to the BWW blocked the development of the random-bred embryos. Supplementing the BWW with Ham's F-10 components revealed that hypoxanthine (6-30 microM) was responsible for the developmental block to the random-bred embryos. The hypoxanthine block was partially (40%) reversed by adding the chelating agent, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Breeding experiments showed that the hypoxanthine sensitivity of embryos from CD-1 mothers was not affected by the paternal genome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loutradis et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: