Cyber defense increasingly relies on teams of autonomous agents that must act under partial observability while adversaries shift tactics and objectives over time. Standard multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods often overfit to fixed threat models, whereas worst-case robust training can be overly conservative and fail to use observations about the active attack regime. We propose posterior-conditioned MARL, a context-aware framework formulated as a decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (Dec-POMDP). In addition to its local history, each defender conditions its decentralized policy on a shared attack-context belief, a probabilistic representation of the attack regime inferred online from recent multi-agent interaction trajectories. This belief provides a low-dimensional representation of evolving adversarial behavior and enables coordinated adaptation during execution without test-time policy optimization or retraining. We provide a performance analysis that quantifies how errors in the inferred attack-context belief translate into degraded long-term defense performance, clarifying the tradeoff between robustness and adaptivity. Experiments on the Cyber Autonomy Gym for Experimentation (CybORG) CAGE-4 cyber operations testbed show improved mission reward and adaptability, particularly under mixed and switching attack conditions, compared with domain-randomized, worst-case robust, and hierarchical defense baselines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazeminajafabadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: