Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nano/microplastics (N/MPs) induce phytotoxicity and represent a significant global threat to terrestrial and agricultural ecosystems. However, the defense mechanisms of plants against different-sized N/MPs remain largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the interactions between polystyrene (PS) NPs (50 and 100 nm) and PS-MPs (200 and 500 nm) with taro ( Colocasia esculenta ). We found that PS particles of varying sizes exhibited differential root adsorption and penetration, with PS-NPs capable of penetrating the root epidermis, whereas PS-MPs were totally excluded. Notably, taro demonstrated the capacity to recognize different sizes of N/MPs and responded with varying degrees of resistance. In reaction to the more toxic and penetrating 50 nm PS-NPs, the roots mobilized a robust defense mechanism with three levels: molecular, compositional, and ultrastructural. This defense was achieved by activating lignin synthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and lipid transport, resulting in a doubling of the lignified region of the root and increases in cell wall thickness of 116%, 56.3%, and 22.5% in the epidermis, exodermis, and cortex, respectively. Consequently, roots excluded all four sizes of N/MPs outside the vascular tissue and prevented the contamination of the corms. Our study provides new insights into the interaction mechanisms of N/MPs with plants and demonstrates the crucial role of root barriers in sustaining food safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: