Key result
In mechanically ventilated rats resuscitated after haemorrhagic shock, linopirdine-supplemented normal saline dose-dependently reduced fluid requirements by up to 55%.
Why the study?
Does linopirdine reduce fluid resuscitation requirements and tissue oedema in rat models of haemorrhagic shock?
Does linopirdine reduce fluid resuscitation requirements and tissue oedema in rat models of haemorrhagic shock?
Linopirdine supplementation in resuscitation fluids safely and dose-dependently reduces fluid requirements and tissue oedema in rat models of haemorrhagic shock.
Caution against clinical use; leaves open translation of linopirdine-supplemented resuscitation to human shock trials.
Recently, we demonstrated that Kv7 voltage-activated potassium channel inhibitors reduce fluid resuscitation requirements in short-term rat models of haemorrhagic shock. The aim of the present study was to further delineate the therapeutic potential and side effect profile of the Kv7 channel blocker linopirdine in various rat models of severe haemorrhagic shock over clinically relevant time periods. Intravenous administration of linopirdine, either before (1 or 3 mg/kg) or after (3 mg/kg) a 40% blood volume haemorrhage, did not affect blood pressure and survival in lethal haemorrhage models without fluid resuscitation. A single bolus of linopirdine (3 mg/kg) at the beginning of fluid resuscitation after haemorrhagic shock transiently reduced early fluid requirements in spontaneously breathing animals that were resuscitated for 3.5 hours. When mechanically ventilated rats were resuscitated after haemorrhagic shock with normal saline (NS) or with linopirdine-supplemented (10, 25 or 50 μg/mL) NS for 4.5 hours, linopirdine significantly and dose-dependently reduced fluid requirements by 14%, 45% and 55%, respectively. Lung and colon wet/dry weight ratios were reduced with linopirdine (25/50 μg/mL). There was no evidence for toxicity or adverse effects based on measurements of routine laboratory parameters and inflammation markers in plasma and tissue homogenates. Our findings support the concept that linopirdine-supplementation of resuscitation fluids is a safe and effective approach to reduce fluid requirements and tissue oedema formation during resuscitation from haemorrhagic shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nassoiy et al. (2018) studied Haemorrhagic shock. Linopirdine vs. Normal saline without linopirdine / no fluid resuscitation was evaluated on Fluid resuscitation requirements. In mechanically ventilated rats resuscitated after haemorrhagic shock, linopirdine-supplemented normal saline dose-dependently reduced fluid requirements by up to 55%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: