Key result
Elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels upon admission independently predicted an unfavorable 90-day functional prognosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR 1.49).
Why the study?
The study was designed to explore the correlation between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and prognosis in patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Does elevated admission BNP predict poor prognosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Cohort (n=932)
No
Does elevated admission BNP predict poor prognosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Odds Ratio: 1.49 (95% CI 1.01–2.2)
p-value: p=0.047
Elevated admission BNP levels independently predict unfavorable 90-day functional outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, highlighting the clinical relevance of brain-heart interactions.
May support BNP for aSAH risk stratification; leaves open incremental value beyond clinical scores.
Objective This study aims to explore the correlation between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and prognosis in patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between January 2015 and September 2021. Plasma BNP levels were measured upon admission and log-transformed to reduce skewness. Elevated BNP was defined as lgBNP ≥1.79 (equivalent to BNP ≥62 pg./mL). The primary outcome was poor prognosis, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 3 at 90 days. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between BNP levels and prognosis. Additionally, we assessed the potential impact of incorporating BNP into a predictive model for poor prognosis. Results The statistical analysis encompassed a total of 932 patients. Among them, 171 individuals experienced unfavorable prognosis (mRS ≥3) during follow-up, and 444 patients had elevated BNP levels, defined as lgBNP ≥1.79. After accounting for confounding factors, elevated BNP levels remained a significant independent risk factor of a poor prognosis (p = 0.047, OR = 1.49, 95%CI = 1.01–2.20). Nevertheless, BNP’s predictive value alone might not warrant its inclusion in a prognostic model. Conclusion Elevated BNP levels independently forecast unfavorable prognosis in patients with aSAH, even though the cutoff value is lower than the cardiology standards. Continuous monitoring and personalized hospitalization plans can be vital for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) (n=932). Elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP ≥62 pg/mL or lgBNP ≥1.79) vs. Normal BNP (lgBNP <1.79) was evaluated on Poor prognosis, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 3 at 90 days (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01–2.20, p=0.047). Elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels upon admission independently predicted an unfavorable 90-day functional prognosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR 1.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: