Key result
Compared with MRI, 2D echo with knowledge-based 3D reconstruction (3DR) was the most accurate technique for assessing right ventricular volumes, underestimating EDV by 6.6 mL (P<0.001).
Why the study?
How do different echocardiographic techniques compare to MRI for assessing right ventricular volumes in children after tetralogy of Fallot repair?
Observational (n=70)
How do different echocardiographic techniques compare to MRI for assessing right ventricular volumes in children after tetralogy of Fallot repair?
Knowledge-based 3D reconstruction (3DR) echocardiography is highly feasible and the most accurate echocardiographic technique for assessing right ventricular volumes in post-operative TOF patients compared to MRI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 3DR echo for RV assessment in repaired TOF; leaves open prospective validation versus MRI.
AIMS: Different echocardiographic techniques are available for assessing right ventricular (RV) volumes but their clinical validity has not been well established. We compared the feasibility, reproducibility and accuracy of three different echocardiographic techniques for measuring RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in children after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy patients (age 14.2 ± 7.3 years) were studied using three-dimensional (3D) volume acquisition analysis (Tomtec, Germany), 2D echo with knowledge-based 3D reconstruction (3DR) (Ventripoint, USA) and the four-chamber area (4C area) methods. Parameters analysed were RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume and EF. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were available in 41 patients. Intra- and inter-observer as well as inter-technique variability was assessed using Pearson's correlation analysis (R), coefficient of variance, and Bland-Altman analysis. Feasibility was good for all echo techniques (91% for the 3D, 98% for the 3DR, and 100% for the 4C area method). Intra- and inter-observer variability was low for both 3DR and the 3D echo, while more variability was observed for the 4C method. Compared with MRI volumes, 3DR and 3D underestimated EDV by 6.6 ± 10 and 18.2 ± 17.8 mL, respectively, (P < 0.001), while the 4C area method overestimated the EDV by 9.6 ± 33 mL, not significant due to a wide range. CONCLUSION: Current echocardiographic techniques to assess RV volumes are highly feasible and reproducible in paediatric post-operative TOF patients. When compared with MRI measurements, 3DR was the most accurate technique but requires extra equipment that is not readily available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dragulescu et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Tetralogy of Fallot (n=70). 2D echo with knowledge-based 3D reconstruction (3DR) vs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV) compared to MRI (MD -6.6 mL, p=<0.001). Compared with MRI, 2D echo with knowledge-based 3D reconstruction (3DR) was the most accurate technique for assessing right ventricular volumes, underestimating EDV by 6.6 mL (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: