Why the study?
Does antiplatelet therapy improve peripheral vascular outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia?
Does antiplatelet therapy improve peripheral vascular outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia?
Despite widespread guideline endorsement, antiplatelet therapy shows a relative lack of efficacy for peripheral vascular outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia.
May warrant reevaluation of antiplatelet use for peripheral outcomes in CLI; leaves open the need for dedicated randomized trials.
Antiplatelet therapy is invariably prescribed for patients with peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia, and numerous major society guidelines espouse their use, but high-quality data in this high-risk and challenging patient population are often lacking. This article summarizes the major guidelines for antiplatelet therapy, reviews the major studies of antiplatelet therapy in peripheral arterial disease (including data for aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, cilostazol, and prostanoids), and offers perspective on the potential benefits of ticagrelor, vorapaxar, and rivaroxaban. The review concludes with a discussion of the relative lack of efficacy that antiplatelet therapy has shown in regard to peripheral vascular outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azarbal et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: