Why the study?
ECG signals are nonlinear and difficult to interpret and analyze for the detection of ventricular arrhythmias.
Does transforming ECG signals into images and applying deep learning feature fusion improve the automated detection of ventricular arrhythmias?
Does transforming ECG signals into images and applying deep learning feature fusion improve the automated detection of ventricular arrhythmias?
Transforming 1D ECG signals into 2D images for deep learning classification provides a highly accurate automated method for detecting ventricular arrhythmias without requiring complex pre-processing or QRS complex detection.
High-accuracy image-based ventricular arrhythmia detection is hypothesis-generating; leaves open prospective clinical validation before any practice change.
Provocative heart disease is related to ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Ventricular tachyarrhythmia is an irregular and fast heart rhythm that emerges from inappropriate electrical impulses in the ventricles of the heart. Different types of arrhythmias are associated with different patterns, which can be identified. An electrocardiogram (ECG) is the major analytical tool used to interpret and record ECG signals. ECG signals are nonlinear and difficult to interpret and analyze. We propose a new deep learning approach for the detection of VA. Initially, the ECG signals are transformed into images that have not been done before. Later, these images are normalized and utilized to train the AlexNet, VGG-16 and Inception-v3 deep learning models. Transfer learning is performed to train a model and extract the deep features from different output layers. After that, the features are fused by a concatenation approach, and the best features are selected using a heuristic entropy calculation approach. Finally, supervised learning classifiers are utilized for final feature classification. The results are evaluated on the MIT-BIH dataset and achieved an accuracy of 97.6% (using Cubic Support Vector Machine as a final stage classifier).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naz et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: