Why the study?
Is pacemaker implantation in a neck pocket a safe and feasible alternative for patients with coexisting breast cancer?
Is pacemaker implantation in a neck pocket a safe and feasible alternative for patients with coexisting breast cancer?
Placing a pacemaker in a neck pocket is a feasible alternative to lead extraction or epicardial approaches in patients with breast cancer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support neck-pocket pacemaker placement in breast cancer patients; leaves open need for prospective safety data.
AIMS: The combination of breast cancer and the need for a pacemaker is infrequent, and device implantation under these circumstances may be a technical challenge with several treatment options, most of them complex. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients, all women, with an average age of 69.62 ± 11.4 years. We present a technique for patients with bilateral breast cancer who need a pacemaker or those who had already implanted a device and developed a homolateral breast cancer. All the pacemakers were implanted in a neck pocket, as a first implantation or if they were moved from a prepectoral pocket to the neck. Seven patients had a good outcome and one had an infection. CONCLUSION: We suggest a simple alternative to lead extraction or epicardial approach in patients with coexisting breast cancer and the need for a rhythm control device consisting in placing the device in a neck pocket and preserving the existing leads by tunnelling them either above or below the clavicle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzetti et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: