Why the study?
Real-life data on the efficacy of lipoprotein apheresis in pregnant women with hyperlipoproteinemia(a), cardiovascular disease, and an increased risk of preeclampsia are limited.
Does lipoprotein apheresis improve uteroplacental circulation and prolong pregnancy in a pregnant woman with severely elevated Lp(a), ASCVD, and high risk of preeclampsia?
Does lipoprotein apheresis improve uteroplacental circulation and prolong pregnancy in a pregnant woman with severely elevated Lp(a), ASCVD, and high risk of preeclampsia?
Lipoprotein apheresis may be a safe and effective therapeutic option to prevent ASCVD progression and prolong pregnancy in women with severely elevated Lp(a) and a high risk of preeclampsia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for lipoprotein apheresis in high-risk Lp(a) pregnancy; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Background: Preeclampsia is a common and serious pregnancy-induced disease, with potential severe maternal and fetal complications. Recently, an increased lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) concentration, an important factor in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) pathogenesis, has been identified as a sensitive and specific marker of preeclampsia severity. Although lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is currently used in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) and CVD, real-life data on its efficacy among pregnant women with an increased risk of preeclampsia are limited. Case presentation: We present the case of a pregnant woman with severely elevated Lp(a), two previous episodes of the acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary disease treated with long-term LA before pregnancy, and a high risk of preeclampsia (as assessed using combined test screening). An increased pulsatility index and early diastolic notch were observed on Doppler interrogation at 18 weeks' gestation. Biweekly LA therapy was re-initiated at 21 weeks' gestation. The LA safely removed 70% of the serum Lp(a) concentration and reduced low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by 60%. We also observed an improvement in her urine protein/creatinine ratio, a reduction in the pulsatility index, and a notch on Doppler interrogation. The pregnancy lasted until week 36, when severe preeclampsia prompted an emergency cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Pregnancy in women with elevated Lp(a), CVD, and a high risk of preeclampsia can present challenges in clinical management. Our case report indicates the benefits of LA in preventing atherosclerotic CVD progression during pregnancy, its potential influence on uteroplacental circulation, and prolongation of pregnancy for the best possible intrauterine fetus development. LA may be considered as a treatment option during pregnancy in such conditions. In addition, in pregnant women with CVD, we suggest screening using a combined test and measurement of Lp(a) as a marker of preeclampsia severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marlęga-Linert et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: