Why the study?
Does nurses using the Manchester Triage System (MTS) improve the identification of high risk cardiac chest pain in patients attending with chest pain compared to researchers using evidence-based prognostic indicators?
Does nurses using the Manchester Triage System (MTS) improve the identification of high risk cardiac chest pain in patients attending with chest pain compared to researchers using evidence-based prognostic indicators?
Nurses using the Manchester Triage System demonstrate high sensitivity (86.8%) for identifying high-risk cardiac chest pain, supporting its utility as an effective initial triage tool.
Supports MTS for nurse triage of cardiac chest pain; hypothesis-generating pending comparison with evidence-based indicators.
AIM: To assess the ability of nurses using the Manchester Triage System (MTS) to identify those patients with chest pain requiring immediate electrocardiogram (ECG) and physician assessment within ten minutes. METHOD: A four-week prospective cohort of all patients attending with chest pain compared detection of risk by nurses using the MTS to that of researchers using best available evidence-based prognostic indicators from history. RESULTS: The study of 167 patients showed that nurses using MTS had a sensitivity of 86.8 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI), 78.4-92.3 per cent) and a specificity of 72.4 per cent (95 per cent CI, 61.4-81.2 per cent) when identifying high risk cardiac chest pain. CONCLUSION: Nurses using the MTS are a sensitive tool for identifying high risk cardiac chest pain but further work is required to assess whether additional training can improve sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Speake et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: