Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ring-opening polymerizations of ε-caprolactone (CL) and L,L-dilactide (LA) initiated by tin(II) octoate (Sn(Oct)2) and zinc octoate (Zn(Oct)2) and co-initiated with butyl alcohol (BuOH) carried out in tetrahydrofuran as a solvent at 80 °C were studied. By means of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, the formation of several populations of polyester macromolecules bearing various end-groups was revealed, namely for poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL): BuO(O)CPCLOH (A), BuO(O)CPCLOct (B), HO(O)CPCLOH (C), HO(O)CPCLOct (D), and PCL cyclics (E), and for poly(L-lactide) (PLA): BuO(O)CPLAOH (A′), BuO(O)CPLAOct (B′), HO(O)CPLAOH (C′), and HO(O)CPLAOct (D′) (where Bu = C4H9 and Oct = O(O)CCH(C2H5)C4H9). In these polymerizations the end-groups in the originally formed macromolecules change slowly with time. In the LA/Sn(Oct)2/BuOH system at the beginning of polymerization almost exclusively macromolecules of the structure A′ are formed and then structures B′, C′, and D′ start to appear, however, after a period more than 300 times (at 80 °C) longer than that required for full monomer conversion, these macromolecules give exclusively esterified B′ and D′ chains. With Zn(Oct)2/BuOH all of these processes are much slower and less selective. Dependencies of mass fraction of macromolecules with various end-groups on time in L,L-dilactide polymerization initiated with Sn(Oct)2/BuOH system. Symbols ▵, ▴, ○, • correspond to PLA populations A′, B′, C′, and D′.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Libiszowski et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: