This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Emerging nanodrug delivery strategies seek to overcome tumor heterogeneity and enhance drug penetration in the dense matrix of solid tumors. This study presents a dual-responsive nanoplatform, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-disulfide-polyethylene glycol-glutamate (PLGA-SS-PEG-Glu) loaded with Gambogic acid (GA), engineered to exploit γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) and glutathione (GSH) triggers specific to the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) microenvironment. Designed with Boc-L-Glutamic Acid-1-tert-butyl ester (Boc-Glu-OtBu), this nanoplatform achieves enzyme-triggered charge reversal to enhance tumor penetration, facilitating GGT-induced charge-switching and GSH-responsive GA release. In vitro, PLGA-SS-PEG-Glu@GA shows potent cytotoxicity (IC 50 = 0.80 μg/ml) against 4T1 TNBC cells, inducing apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation through energy-dependent, GGT-mediated endocytosis. Compensatory Nrf2/HO-1 activation mechanistically induced by GA-loaded nanoplatform ultimately potentiated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (Bcl-2/caspase-3) initiation, promoting apoptosis. In vivo, this nanoplatform leveraged its tumor-specific enzymatic and redox microenvironment-responsive properties to achieve enhanced deep intratumoral penetration. Treatment for 2 weeks effectively suppressed primary tumor growth, while extended therapy to one month significantly inhibited the formation of pulmonary metastatic foci. This dual-responsive strategy not only elevates drug bioavailability at the tumor site but also provides a promising solution to overcome critical barriers in solid tumor drug delivery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: