Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this article is to show that the structure of Linear B inscriptions was both of semasiographic and phonographic nature. Despite the indisputable role of the syllabographic signs, they should be treated neither as a dominant element in the inscriptions nor as the indicator of the general principle in the texts. Analysis of the writing strategies in the Linear B documents has shown that the texts were intended to be recognised as an overall communicate instead of to be read phonetically sign by sign. Such a strategy not only explains the inconsistent use of ideograms or so-called double-writing but also indicates that the main principle of the inscriptions was non-linear and non-linguistic but spatial and based on meaning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Małgorzata Zadka (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: