Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography techniques, which have a resolution of 80 µm. However, such imaging techniques still remain a high-end research tool rather than a diagnostic tool for clinical applications. Thus, the limited accessibility and affordability of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography have become major concerns for the general public. Alternatively, combining bone mineral density measurements with stochastic assessments of spatial bone mineral density distribution from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images may offer an economic and efficient approach to non-invasively evaluate skeletal integrity and identify the at-risk population for osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this critical review is to assess bone fragility with clinical imaging modalities. CONCLUSION: . However, it is an expensive method of imaging modality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: