Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The cell-surface charge and cell-surface hydrophobicity of 10 strains of Azospirillum spp. were evaluated by the aqueous, two-polymer phase partitioning assay. Azospirillum spp. had moderate cell-surface hydrophobicity and charge, lower than known values for human pathogens. The hydrophobicity and charge values were higher in solid than in liquid media. A general pattern of modifying hydrophobicity and charge by external treatments of the cells of all strains was not found, but various chemicals, temperatures, and enzymatic treatments changed the cell-surface hydrophobicity and charge in different strains. A similar hydrophobic protein was isolated, and partially characterized, from two strains of A. brasilense and one strain of A. lipoferum . This study proposes: (i) cell-surface hydrophobicity and charge of Azospirillum spp. can be affected by external treatments of the bacterium cell, and (ii) hydrophobicity and charge may play a role, perhaps small, in the primary adsorption of Azospirillum spp. to surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castellanos et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: