Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
small morphs did not differ in slope or Y-intercept, and data for these two groups were pooled for comparison with cannibals. Each cannibal allometric regression had a lower slope than the corresponding noncannibal regression, but these differences were not significant. In addition, the Y-intercepts of cannibal regressions exceeded the Y-intercept of the appropriate noncannibal regression. These findings suggest that head size does not increase at a faster rate relative to body size in cannibals, but that cannibals begin with a larger head early in ontogeny. CANNIBALISM often has been viewed as a laboratory artifact or an anomaly occurring in unusually dense and stressful situations, but cannibalism occurs in natural populations of a number of species and apparently is a common phenomenon in nature (Fox, 1975a). The circumstances under which cannibalism occurs
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierce et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: