This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Direct-to-consumer channels have developed as alternatives to conventional agri-food systems characterized by long supply chains, market concentration, and limited connections between producers and consumers. Yet despite their potential, these channels face significant limitations that constrain their expansion and keep them largely confined to niche markets. In response, food hubs have emerged as intermediaries that aggregate and distribute products from multiple farms, enabling small- and medium-sized producers to reach institutional buyers while preserving the goals and values of local food systems. Synthesizing evidence from 34 peer-reviewed empirical studies, this review consolidates a dispersed body of research by clarifying the organizational and marketing structures, financing approaches, and documented impacts of food hubs. In doing so, the review shows that food hubs should be understood not simply as alternative distribution channels but as organizational intermediaries whose viability depends on the complex coordination of logistics, revenue streams, stakeholder relations, and economic and social objectives. It also highlights persistent challenges in farmer coordination, institutional market stability, and financial resilience that underscore the difficulties of sustaining food hubs and scaling local food systems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ubertino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: