Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper explores liquidity effects following the introduction of electronic limit-order trading for 48 illiquid stocks listed on the FTSE AIM Index. We find evidence of a sustained increase in the liquidity of the stocks as a result of limit-order trading. Furthermore, the enhancement in the liquidity of the stocks is due to a decrease in the direct cost of trading as opposed to a reduction in the asymmetric information cost of transacting. The empirical findings suggest that a hybrid market with a limit-order book and voluntary dealers outperforms a dealership market with obligatory market makers for illiquid stocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andros Gregoriou (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: