Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An examination is made of the assumptions customarily used in estimating the effect of space-charge in an axially symmetric beam. It is shown that, subject to certain restrictions, the assumptions arc consistent with a coaxial, cylindrical conducting boundary. For small amounts of divergence in an initially parallel beam, a hyperbola solution is proposed as an alternative to the usual solution which involves a tabulated function. Lt is then argued that in some oases there is reason for believing that the hyperbola solution may be as good, or better, an approximation than the usual solution, oven when the divergence is not small
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. R. Harrison (1958) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: