This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Genetically encoded visible fluorescent proteins (VFPs) are a key tool used to visualize cellular processes. However, compared to synthetic fluorophores, VFPs are photophysically complex. This photophysical complexity includes the presence of non-emitting, dark proteins within the ensemble of VFPs. Quantitative fluorescence microcopy approaches that rely on VFPs to obtain molecular insights are hampered by the presence of these dark proteins. To account for the presence of dark proteins, it is necessary to know the fraction of dark proteins ( f dark ) in the ensemble. To date, f dark has rarely been quantified, and different methods to determine f dark have not been compared. Here, we use and compare two different methods to determine the f dark of four commonly used VFPs: EGFP, SYFP2, mStrawberry, and mRFP1. In the first, direct method, we make use of VFP tandems and single-molecule two-color coincidence detection (TCCD). The second method relies on comparing the bright state fluorescence quantum yield obtained by photonic manipulation to the ensemble-averaged fluorescence quantum yield of the VFP. Our results show that, although very different in nature, both methods are suitable to obtain f dark . Both methods show that all four VFPs contain a considerable fraction of dark proteins. We determine f dark values between 30 and 60% for the different VFPs. The high values for f dark of these commonly used VFPs highlight that f dark has to be accounted for in quantitative microscopy and spectroscopy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heesink et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: