Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC 3 ) is a promising solution for mitigating CO 2 emissions in cement production by substantially replacing clinker with widely available supplementary cementitious materials . While calcination is the conventional method for activating clay, there is a growing interest in mechanical activation . Incorporating mechanically activated kaolin into LC 3 formulation would offer a novel approach to producing this cement. This study aims to assess the impact of replacing calcined clay (CC) with mechanically activated clay (MC) in LC 3 properties and relevant features. Accordingly, LC 3 with MC substitutions ranging from 0 to 100 wt% were formulated. The resulting cements were characterised to evaluate their physicochemical properties , microstructure, strength , and pore distribution. LC 3 incorporating MC exhibited comparable crystalline and amorphous phases to LC 3 containing CC. However, the incorporation of MC accelerated hydration, leading to the earlier formation of carboaluminates and consumption of portlandite , alongside enhanced compressive strength at early curing stages. At 28 days, LC 3 with 100 wt% of MC displayed similar compressive strength (42 MPa) to LC 3 with 100 wt% of CC (40 MPa) with comparable pore distribution and microstructure. These findings validate MC's potential to substitute CC in LC 3 , offering an alternative for activating clay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mañosa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: