Why the study?
Does a dual-navigator configuration improve SNR and navigator efficiency compared to single-navigator or breathhold configurations for quantifying left ventricular strain using DENSE MRI in healthy subjects?
Does a dual-navigator configuration improve SNR and navigator efficiency compared to single-navigator or breathhold configurations for quantifying left ventricular strain using DENSE MRI in healthy subjects?
A dual navigator configuration for spiral cine DENSE MRI provides the highest SNR for quantifying left ventricular strain in adults and children, while visual feedback can maintain navigator efficiency.
May enable free-breathing LV strain assessment; hypothesis-generating for dual-navigator DENSE before patient studies or practice change.
PURPOSE: To determine the optimal respiratory navigator gating configuration for the quantification of left ventricular strain using spiral cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional spiral cine DENSE was performed on a 3 Tesla MRI using two single-navigator configurations (retrospective, prospective) and a combined "dual-navigator" configuration in 10 healthy adults and 20 healthy children. The adults also underwent breathhold DENSE as a reference standard for comparisons. Peak left ventricular strains, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and navigator efficiency were compared. Subjects also underwent dual-navigator gating with and without visual feedback to determine the effect on navigator efficiency. RESULTS: There were no differences in circumferential, radial, and longitudinal strains between navigator-gated and breathhold DENSE (P = 0.09-0.95) (as confidence intervals, retrospective: [-1.0%-1.1%], [-7.4%-2.0%], [-1.0%-1.2%]; prospective: [-0.6%-2.7%], [-2.8%-8.3%], [-0.3%-2.9%]; dual: [-1.6%-0.5%], [-8.3%-3.2%], [-0.8%-1.9%], respectively). The dual configuration maintained SNR compared with breathhold acquisitions (16 versus 18, P = 0.06). SNR for the prospective configuration was lower than for the dual navigator in adults (P = 0.004) and children (P < 0.001). Navigator efficiency was higher (P < 0.001) for both retrospective (54%) and prospective (56%) configurations compared with the dual configuration (35%). Visual feedback improved the dual configuration navigator efficiency to 55% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When quantifying left ventricular strains using spiral cine DENSE MRI, a dual navigator configuration results in the highest SNR in adults and children. In adults, a retrospective configuration has good navigator efficiency without a substantial drop in SNR. Prospective gating should be avoided because it has the lowest SNR. Visual feedback represents an effective option to maintain navigator efficiency while using a dual navigator configuration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:786-794.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamlet et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: