Why the study?
Does DENSE MRI accurately compute regional strains compared to standard tagged MRI in healthy subjects and DCM patients?
Does DENSE MRI accurately compute regional strains compared to standard tagged MRI in healthy subjects and DCM patients?
DENSE MRI provides accurate evaluation of regional strains comparable to standard tagged MRI in both healthy subjects and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Supports DENSE MRI for regional strain in DCM; leaves open need for prospective outcome studies before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: Fast cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) MR has higher spatial resolution and enables rapid postprocessing. Thus we compared the accuracy of regional strains computation by DENSE with tagged MR in healthy and non-ischemic, non-valvular dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validation of three-dimensional regional strains computed with DENSE was conducted in reference to standard tagged MRI (TMRI) in healthy subjects and patients with DCM. Additional repeatability studies in healthy subjects were conducted to increase confidence in DENSE. A meshfree multiquadrics radial point interpolation method (RPIM) was used for computing Lagrange strains in sixteen left ventricular segments. Bland-Altman analysis and Student's t-tests were conducted to observe similarities in regional strains between sequences and in DENSE repeatability studies. RESULTS: Regional circumferential strains ranged from -0.21 ± 0.07 (Lateral-Apex) to -0.11 ± 0.05 (Posterorseptal-Base) in healthy subjects and -0.15 ± 0.04 (Anterior-Apex) to -0.02 ± 0.08 (Posterorseptal-Base) in DCM patients. Computed mean differences in regional circumferential strain from the DENSE-TMRI comparison study was 0.01 ± 0.03 (95% limits of agreement) in normal subjects, -0.01 ± 0.06 in DCM patients and 0.0 ± 0.02 in repeatability studies, with similar agreements in longitudinal and radial strains. CONCLUSION: We found agreement between DENSE and tagged MR in patients and volunteers in terms of evaluation of regional strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kar et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: