Numerical simulations of flow in a skeletal muscle ventricle model show good agreement with physical models, demonstrating that vortex formation could reduce fluid residence time.
May inform flow optimization in skeletal muscle ventricle devices; leaves open clinical translation from animal data alone.
Flow patterns generated during ventricular filling have been investigated for three different combinations of flow rate and injection volume. The numerical solutions from a commercially available computational fluid dynamics package were compared with observations made under identical flow conditions in a physical model for the purpose of code validation. Particle pathlines were generated from the numerical velocity data and compared with corresponding flow-visualization pictures. A vortex formed at the inlet to the ventricle in both cases: During the filling phase, the vortex expanded and traveled toward the apex of the ventricle until, at the end of filling, the vortex occupied the full radial extent of the ventricle; the vortex continued to travel once the filling process had ended. The vortices in vitro were more circular in shape and occupied a smaller volume than those generated by the numerical model. Nevertheless, comparison of the trajectories of the vortex centres showed that there was good agreement for the three conditions studied. Postprocessing of velocity data from the numerical solution yielded wall shear-stress measurements and particle pathlines that clearly illustrate the mass-transport qualities of the traveling vortex structure. For the cases considered here, the vortex transit produced a time-dependent shear stress distribution that had a peak value of 20 dynes cm-2, with substantially lower levels of shear stress in those regions not reached by the traveling vortex. We suggest that vortex formation and travel could reduce the residence time of fluid within a skeletal muscle ventricle, provided that the vortex travels the complete length of the ventricle before fluid is ejected at the start of the next cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: