Why the study?
The study investigated the 10-year outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in Finland.
How have the outcomes of TAVR and SAVR for severe aortic stenosis evolved over a 10-year period in Finland?
Population
6463 patients who underwent TAVR or SAVR with a bioprosthesis for aortic stenosis
Comparison
TAVR vs SAVR
Design
Nationwide registry study
Follow-up
2 years
Authors
Loading...
Temporal survival gains in severe AS support expanded treatment access; leaves open whether TAVR introduction drove improvements versus concurrent factors.
How have the outcomes of TAVR and SAVR for severe aortic stenosis evolved over a 10-year period in Finland?
Over a 10-year period in Finland, the introduction of TAVR was associated with increased invasive treatment of severe aortic stenosis and significant improvements in early and 2-year survival for both TAVR and SAVR.
Mäkikallio et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: