Why the study?
What are the predictors of failed transvenous left ventricular lead implantation in CHF patients undergoing CRT?
What are the predictors of failed transvenous left ventricular lead implantation in CHF patients undergoing CRT?
Permanent atrial fibrillation and increased left atrial diameter are independent predictors of unsuccessful transvenous left ventricular lead implantation during CRT procedures.
Evaluation of: Macias A, Garcia-Bolao I, Diaz-Infante E et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: predictive factors of unsuccessful left ventricular lead implant. Eur. Heart J. 28, 450–456 (2007).Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and hospitalization in the elderly of industrialized nations. In CHF patients with moderate-to-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and significant dyssynchrony, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve functional status and decrease heart failure mortality and hospitalizations. Inability to transvenously implant a lead within a desired branch of the coronary sinus for CRT occurs in 5–10% of cases. The article under evaluation identifies two independent predictors of failed transvenous left ventricular lead implantation – the presence of permanent atrial fibrillation and an increased anteroposterior left atrial diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weachter et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: