Why the study?
Diagnosing sepsis in critical care remains challenging due to the lack of gold-standard diagnostics, and calprotectin has been proposed as a diagnostic marker.
Does calprotectin improve the diagnosis of sepsis compared to CRP in adult patients admitted to the ICU?
Does calprotectin improve the diagnosis of sepsis compared to CRP in adult patients admitted to the ICU?
Calprotectin is inferior to CRP as a diagnostic marker for identifying sepsis in critically ill patients at ICU admission.
Calprotectin underperforms CRP for sepsis diagnosis at ICU admission; leaves open utility in subgroups or combinations pending prospective studies.
Background Diagnosing sepsis in critical care remains a challenge due to the lack of gold-standard diagnostics. Calprotectin (S100A8/A9) has been proposed as a diagnostic marker to identify sepsis in critically ill patients. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) to distinguish between sepsis and non-sepsis on intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Methods Admission biobank blood samples from adult patients admitted to four ICUs (2015-2018) were used to analyse calprotectin and CRP. All adult patients were screened retrospectively for the sepsis-3 criteria at ICU admission. The diagnostic performance of calprotectin and CRP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results We included 4732 patients, of whom 44% had sepsis. Calprotectin levels were higher in sepsis (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to diagnose sepsis was 0.61 for calprotectin compared to 0.72 for CRP (p < 0.001). Among microbiological subgroups of sepsis patients, fungal sepsis had the highest level of calprotectin. Conclusions The diagnostic performance of calprotectin in identifying sepsis patients at ICU admission was inferior to that of CRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lengquist et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: