Why the study?
Current knowledge on thrombolysis is fragmented, making it difficult to gain a complete picture to build a numerical model simulating thrombolysis and predicting outcomes in ischemic stroke.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Perspective paper
Numerical models for stroke thrombolysis highlight unresolved questions; leaves open their clinical translation pending experimental validation.
This perspective paper considers thrombolysis in the context of ischemic strokes, intending to build eventually a numerical model capable of simulating the thrombolytic treatment and predicting patient outcomes. Numerical modeling is a scientific methodology based on an abstraction of a system but requires understanding their spatio-temporal interactions. However, although important, the current knowledge on thrombolysis is fragmented in contributions from which it is difficult to obtain a complete picture of the process, especially in a clinically relevant setup. This paper discusses, from a general point of view, how to develop a numerical model to describe the evolution of a patient clot under the action of a thrombolytic drug. We will present critical, yet fundamental, open questions that have emerged during this elaboration and discuss original experimental observations that challenge some of our current knowledge of thrombolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petkantchin et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: