Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dimolybdenum(II,II) complex salts [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4, and [Mo2(µ-O2CMe)2(MeCN)6][BF4]2 have been supported on silica to give materials represented as [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4–SiO2 and [Mo2(µ-O2CMe)2(MeCN)6][BF4]2–SiO2, respectively. Unsupported [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4, [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4–SiO2, unsupported [Mo2(µ-O2CMe)2(MeCN)6][BF4]2 and [Mo2(µ-O2CMe)2(MeCN)6][BF4]2–SiO2 were each tested as heterogeneous catalysts for the ring-opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene (bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene). In the absence of AlEtCl2 cocatalyst [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4–SiO2was the only species to polymerize norbornene, and at 90°C and a reaction time of 48 h the polymerization was essentially quantitative. Species [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4. [Mo2(µ-O2CMe)2(MeCN)6][BF4]2 and [Mo2(µ-O2CMe)2(MeCN)6][BF4]2–SiO2 were found to be completely inactive without AlEtCl2, even at elevated temperatures. In the presence of AlEtCl2 cocatalyst [Mo2(MeCN)8][BF4]4–SiO2 was the only material which failed to polymerize norbornene at room temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCann et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: