Why the study?
Limited data are available on long-term changes in the conduction system following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Does atrioventricular conduction recover over time in patients requiring pacemaker implantation after TAVI?
Does atrioventricular conduction recover over time in patients requiring pacemaker implantation after TAVI?
A substantial proportion of patients requiring a pacemaker after TAVI experience recovery of AV conduction over time, which is reflected by a low right ventricular pacing burden and narrower baseline QRS duration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AV conduction recovery may occur in most post-TAVI PM patients; leaves open optimal dependency monitoring and selective device use.
INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available on long-term changes in the conduction system following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). OBJECTIVE: To assess atrioventricular (AV) conduction changes after TAVI and examine the relationship between pacemaker (PM)-derived parameters and surface ECG findings. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent PM implantation after TAVI between July 2014 and June 2023. Demographic, imaging, procedural, and ECG data were collected. A dedicated follow-up (FU) visit, including device interrogation and a 12-lead ECG recorded during temporary VVI pacing at 30 bpm, was performed on average 1.7 ± 1.3 years post-implant. Based on FU ECGs, patients were classified as having persistent (persAVB) or regressive AV block (regrAVB). RESULTS: Among 377 TAVI procedures, 33 PM implantations (8.7%) were performed at a mean of 5.7 days after the procedure. Indications included third-degree AV block in 27 (81%), second-degree AV block in 3 (9%), and significant bradycardia in 3 (9%). FU ECGs were available for 14 patients; 7 (50%) showed conduction recovery. Baseline QRS duration was significantly wider in persAVB than in regrAVB (107.1 ± 27.3 ms vs. 80.7 ± 1.6 ms; p = 0.038). Median right ventricular pacing (RVp) burden was substantially higher in persAVB (100% [IQR 98.8-100%]) compared with regrAVB (0% [IQR 0-2.5%]; p < 0.001). Pacemaker dependency was present in 28% of persAVB patients and in none of the regrAVB group. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients showed recovery of AV- conduction over time, particularly those without pre-existing conduction disturbances. The degree of RVp closely reflected conduction recovery status during follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krányák et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: