Why the study?
What proportion of new diabetic patients are suitable for optional sulphonylurea or insulin therapy?
What proportion of new diabetic patients are suitable for optional sulphonylurea or insulin therapy?
Only a small fraction of new diabetic patients (7.7%) are suitable for optional sulphonylurea or insulin therapy, limiting the feasibility of future randomized trials on their cardiovascular safety.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Few new diabetic referrals qualify; leaves open feasibility of randomized cardiovascular safety trials for these agents.
Because of the doubts cast on the safety of the sulphonylureas we analysed 1000 consecutive referrals to a diabetic clinic to identify the number of new patients equally suitable for treatment with a sulphonylurea or insulin. After excluding previously diagnosed and treated diabetics and those with a non-diabetic glucose tolerance test there were 531 new diabetics. Youth and insulin dependency, old age or obesity accounted for 390. A further 40 required diet alone, 50 had concomitant disease or socio-domestic circumstances influencing treatment choice, and 10 had secondary diabetes. Thus, only 41 diabetics (7.7% of new patients or 4.1% of total clinic referrals) appeared suitable for optional sulphonylurea or insulin therapy. We conclude that there are relatively few diabetics for whom the questionable safety of the sulphonylureas poses a therapeutic problem, and equally few who would be available for any further long-term, random-allocation trials of their effects upon the cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slater et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: