The cost and the closely related length of time spent in searching for mines or unexploded ordnance (UXO) may well be largely determined by the number of false alarms. False alarms can result in time consuming digging of soil or in additional multisensory tests in the minefield. The authors consider two area-based methods for reducing false alarms. These are: (a) the previously known "declaration" technique and (b) the new /spl delta/ technique, which they introduce. They first derive expressions and lower bounds for false-alarm probabilities as a function of declaration area and discuss their impact on receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves. Second, they exploit characteristics of the statistical distribution of sensory energy in the immediate neighborhood of targets and of false alarms from available calibrated data, to propose the /spl delta/ technique, which significantly improves discrimination between targets and false alarms. The results are abundantly illustrated with statistical data and ROC curves using electromagnetic-induction sensor data made available through DARPA from measurements at various calibrated sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelenbe et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: