This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of postoperative complications, increasing morbidity and healthcare costs. Silver-based dressings are commonly used due to their antimicrobial properties, but their effectiveness in reducing SSIs remains unclear. Aim This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of silver-based dressings compared to non-silver dressings in preventing SSIs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify RCTs comparing silver-based to non-silver dressings for SSI prevention. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024592966). Meta-analysis using random-effects models calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic, and publication bias evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. Results : 12 RCTs with 2,928 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Silver-based dressings significantly reduced SSI risk by 40% compared to non-silver dressings (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p<0.05), with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 53%) Conclusions : Silver-based dressings significantly reduce the risk of SSIs; however, further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm their benefits across different surgical contexts and patient populations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: