Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Efficient lignin conversion is vital to the production of affordable, low-carbon fuels and chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass. However, lignin conversion remains challenging, and the alternative (combustion) can emit harmful air pollutants. This study explores the economic and environmental trade-offs between lignin combustion and microbial utilization for producing bisabolene as a representative biobased fuel or chemical. Results for switchgrass and clean pine-based biorefineries show that using lignin to increase fuel yields rather than combusting it reduces the capital expenditures for the boiler and turbogenerator if the facilities process more than 1100 bone-dry metric tons (bdt) feedstock/day and 560 bdt/day, respectively. No comparable advantage was observed for lower-lignin sorghum feedstock. Deconstructing lignin to bioavailable intermediates and utilizing those small molecules alongside sugars to boost product yields is economically attractive if the overall lignin-to-product conversion yield exceeds 11–20% by mass. Although lignin-to-fuel/chemical conversion can increase life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, most of the lignin can be diverted to fuel/chemical production while maintaining a >60% life-cycle GHG footprint reduction relative to diesel fuel. The results underscore that lignin utilization can be economically advantageous relative to combustion for higher-lignin feedstocks, but efficient depolymerization and high yields during conversion are both crucial to achieving viability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baral et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: