Why the study?
Existing screening methods for ventricular premature complex require prolonged monitoring and have low yield when VPC frequency is low, prompting evaluation of AI-enabled standard ECGs during normal sinus rhythm.
Does an AI-enabled ECG algorithm accurately identify patients with ventricular premature complexes using standard 12-lead ECGs acquired during normal sinus rhythm?
Does an AI-enabled ECG algorithm accurately identify patients with ventricular premature complexes using standard 12-lead ECGs acquired during normal sinus rhythm?
An AI-enabled ECG algorithm can accurately identify patients susceptible to ventricular premature complexes using standard 12-lead ECGs acquired during normal sinus rhythm.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the feasibility of AI-based VPC screening during normal sinus rhythm; leaves open whether this predictive.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular premature complex (VPC) is a common arrhythmia in clinical practice. VPC could trigger ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation or VPC-induced cardiomyopathy in susceptible patients. Existing screening methods require prolonged monitoring and are limited by cost and low yield when the frequency of VPC is low. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is low cost and widely used. We aimed to identify patients with VPC during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning-based ECG reading. METHODS: We developed AI-enabled ECG algorithm using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the ECG signature of VPC presented during NSR using standard 12-lead ECGs. A total of 2515 ECG records from 398 patients with VPC were collected. Among them, only ECG records of NSR without VPC (1617 ECG records) were parsed. RESULTS: A total of 753 normal ECG records from 387 patients under NSR were used for comparison. Both image and time-series datasets were parsed for the training process by the CNN models. The computer architectures were optimized to select the best model for the training process. Both the single-input image model (InceptionV3, accuracy: 0.895, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683-0.937) and multi-input time-series model (ResNet50V2, accuracy: 0.880, 95% CI 0.646-0.943) yielded satisfactory results for VPC prediction, both of which were better than the single-input time-series model (ResNet50V2, accuracy: 0.840, 95% CI 0.629-0.952). CONCLUSIONS: AI-enabled ECG acquired during NSR permits rapid identification at point of care of individuals with VPC and has the potential to predict VPC episodes automatically rather than traditional long-time monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: