Why the study?
Clinical ECG interpretation is often time-consuming and labor-intensive, creating a need for a rapid, inexpensive method to detect abnormal ECGs from scanned printouts using AI.
Does an artificial intelligence deep learning model accurately detect abnormal heart rhythms from scanned ECG tracings compared to a physiological expert?
Does an artificial intelligence deep learning model accurately detect abnormal heart rhythms from scanned ECG tracings compared to a physiological expert?
A deep learning model can accurately detect abnormal heart rhythms from scanned ECG printouts, offering a rapid and inexpensive tool for automated community screening.
AI screening of scanned ECGs may flag abnormals for review in community settings; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is an integral part of the clinical ECG workflow; however, this process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. We aim to develop a rapid, inexpensive means to detect abnormal ECGs using artificial intelligence (AI) from scanned ECG printouts. Methods: The study included 1172 12-lead ECG scans performed in 1172 individuals from a community in Guangzhou, China; 878 (74.9%) were diagnosed with sinus rhythm, and the remaining 294 (25.1%) with abnormal rhythms. A deep learning model consisting of a convolutional neural network based on InceptionV3 and a fully connected layer followed by a GEV activation was trained to classify scanned tracings as either normal or abnormal. Results: In a hold-out testing set, the model achieved a area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.932 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.890, 0.976), 0.816 (95% CI: 0.657, 0.923), 0.993 (95% CI: 0.959, 1.0), 0.969 (95% CI: 0.838, 0.999), and 0.950 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.980) respectively, when using a probability threshold of 0.5. When compared with a physiological expert, these results show comparable performance with a statistically significant increase in specificity and a non-significant decrease in sensitivity at the 95% level. Conclusions: We have developed a rapid, inexpensive, accurate means to detect abnormal ECGs using AI. Easy and accurate identification of such "abnormal" ECGs could allow the mass automated review of ECGs in community settings where abnormal ones could be flagged using AI for detailed clinical review by healthcare professionals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bridge et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: