Key result
Mild therapeutic hypothermia fails to improve cardiac power index or mortality in post-MI cardiogenic shock.
Why the study?
Experimental trials suggested improved outcomes by mild therapeutic hypothermia for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction, but clinical hemodynamic effects were unclear.
Does mild therapeutic hypothermia improve cardiac power index at 24 hours in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=40)
1:1
Does mild therapeutic hypothermia improve cardiac power index at 24 hours in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Mild therapeutic hypothermia for 24 hours does not improve hemodynamics or 30-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Does not support mild therapeutic hypothermia in post-MI cardiogenic shock; challenges prior experimental data suggesting benefit.
BACKGROUND: Experimental trials suggest improved outcome by mild therapeutic hypothermia for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Patients (n=40) with cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention without classic indications for mild therapeutic hypothermia underwent randomization in a 1:1 fashion to mild therapeutic hypothermia for 24 hours or control. The primary end point was cardiac power index at 24 hours; secondary end points included other hemodynamic parameters and serial measurements of arterial lactate. RESULTS: ; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.06). Similarly, all other hemodynamic measurements were not statistically different. Arterial lactate levels at 6, 8, and 10 hours were significantly higher in patients in the mild therapeutic hypothermia group with a slower decline ( P for interaction=0.03). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (60% versus 50%; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.55-2.94; P=0.55). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, mild therapeutic hypothermia failed to show a substantial beneficial effect on cardiac power index at 24 hours in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01890317.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuernau et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (n=40). mild therapeutic hypothermia vs. control was evaluated on cardiac power index at 24 hours (95% CI -0.12 to 0.06). Mild therapeutic hypothermia failed to improve cardiac power index at 24 hours (95% CI, -0.12 to 0.06) or 30-day mortality (60% vs 50%; HR 1.27) in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: