Why the study?
Ventricular septal rupture after AMI is often fatal and optimal surgical timing is discussed, with preoperative hemodynamic status significantly impacting outcomes.
Extracorporeal left ventricular assist device (extra-VAD) may serve as an effective bridge to surgery for patients with severe cardiogenic shock complicating post-MI ventricular septal rupture.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the potential utility of mechanical circulatory support for perioperative stabilization in post-AMI ventricular septal rupture.
Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a rare but often fatal complication. Surgery is considered the preferred treatment, although the optimal timing is discussed. The immediate preoperative hemodynamic status significantly impacts postoperative outcomes, making mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices crucial for perioperative hemodynamic stability. We present the case of a 61-year-old woman with no remarkable cardiological history admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of AMI and VSR. Due to hemodynamic instability and cardiogenic shock, we utilized an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and an extracorporeal left ventricular assist device (extra-VAD) as a bridge to surgery. After 17 days of IABP support, the patient experienced hemodynamic instability, elevated lactate levels, pulmonary edema, and eventually bedside endotracheal infiltration inventor-assisted breathing. Subsequently, the IABP was removed, and the patient underwent 6 days of extra-VAD therapy, resulting in hemodynamic stability, a decline in lactate levels, and a reduction in pulmonary edema on X-ray. Surgical coronary artery bypass grafting and VSR repair were successfully performed without periprocedural complications, and the patient was subsequently discharged. Extra-VAD is useful for serious cardiogenic shock in patients with VSR after AMI and may be considered a reasonable approach as a bridge to surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: