Population
Cardiomyocytes from wild-type, dystrophin-deficient (mdx), and C-terminally truncated Nav 1.5 (ΔSIV) mice
Comparison
Wild-type vs dystrophin-deficient (mdx) vs C-terminally truncated Nav 1.5 (ΔSIV) mice
Design
Single-molecule localization microscopy and modeling study
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals domain-specific nanoscale clustering and reorganization of Nav1.5 in mouse cardiomyocytes, suggesting localized partner proteins drive cardiac arrhythmia phenotypes.
Mutations in the gene encoding the sodium channel Na v 1.5 cause various cardiac arrhythmias. This variety may arise from different determinants of Na v 1.5 expression between cardiomyocyte domains. At the lateral membrane and T-tubules, Na v 1.5 localization and function remain insufficiently characterized. We used novel single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) and modeling to define nanoscale features of Na v 1.5 localization and distribution at the lateral membrane, groove, and T-tubules in wild-type, dystrophin-deficient ( mdx ) mice, and mice expressing C-terminally truncated Na v 1.5 (ΔSIV). We show that Na v 1.5 organizes as distinct clusters in the groove and T-tubules which density and distribution partially depend on SIV and dystrophin. We found that overall reduction in Na v 1.5 expression in mdx and ΔSIV cells results in a non-uniform redistribution with Na v 1.5 being specifically reduced at the groove of ΔSIV and increased in T-tubules of mdx cardiomyocytes. Na v 1.5 mutations may therefore site-specifically affect Na v 1.5 localization and distribution depending on site-specific interacting proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2019 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: